Blaugust 2018

Monday, March 23, 2026

Stoned Again

We're enjoying some very pleasant Spring weather here just now, which was why Mrs. Bhagpuss and I came to be driving out on a sunny March morning last week to take a look at the standing stones at Stanton Drew. There's no shortage of ancient stoneworks within a short drive of where we live and we've visited quite a few but this one was new to us both.

It's unfamiliar to a lot of people, apparently, despite being possibly the third largest stone circle in Britain, after the far better-known Stonehenge and Avebury. Julian Cope, ex-lead singer of the Teardrop Explodes and self-styled Modern Antiquarian, called it "undervalued" and it's certainly under-visited, especially when compared to its two big rivals.

We only thought to visit it because we'd recently been to the village to look at a nursing home for my 93 year-old mother. She's gone somewhere else but the home she didn't move into is right next to the stones so we thought we'd go back for a closer look.

And you can have as close a look as you'd like. Climb all over the things if you want. No-one's gojng to stop you. 

The three competing pre-historic attractions stand orders of magnitude apart in terms of access, with Stonehenge on one side of a massive barrier, literally and financially, with the other two a long way outside.

Stonehenge is fully enclosed and zealously guarded, thanks to decades of varying use and abuse, everything from would-be druids holding solstice ceremonies to the Convoy staging pitched battles with the police. 

As a child, I visited the henge on a school trip. I seem to remember it was already sufficiently commercialized even then to feature a gift shop but we were allowed to touch the stones and there was no fence around them, or at least not in my memory. 

Now you have to book in advance and pay almost £30 just to get inside the main fence as far as the next security cordon, where ropes keep you at a distance from the stones themselves. It's £3 to park your car, too.

If you want to walk among the stones, inside the circle, you'll need to buy the full "Experience". That'll cost you £70! And even then you still don't get to touch anything.

Avebury is a lot more relaxed and it's free, too, although if you use the car park it'll set you back £7. Plenty of free parking in the village, though, or there was when we last went, which admittedly was over a decade ago. You can wander up to the stones and lay on hands, too, which to my way of thinking is pretty much the whole point.

Visiting Stanton Drew costs £1 and that's only if you're honest. There's a box on the gate and you're trusted to drop a coin into it as you go through. If you don't, no-one's going to know because there's no-one there. 

Even with a nominal entrance fee it's still cheaper than Avebury because there's a free car park. The pound goes to the local farmer who owns the land on which the stones are sited. It's a working farm and there are sometimes livestock in the fields, which is why no dogs are allowed. (Avebury is dog-friendly.)

 The size of the car park gives you some indication of the number of visitors the circle at Stanton Drew sees. I'd guess you could get eight cars in it, if everyone parked very carefully. The morning we went, there was just one other vehicle there but a few more people wandered in on foot. It's the kind of place that attracts neo-hippies and ancient history buffs alike but the history buffs tend to come in cars.

Because we had Beryl with us, we had to take it in turns to go to the stones. It's a surprisingly long walk, not least because the stones are bigger than you think, so they look closer than they are.

When I went in, there were a few other people strolling about, moving from monolith to monolith, taking pictures. One guy was lying on one of the stones, his feet higher than his head, taking a photograph of another. 

As I said, if you want to climb up the stones and sit on top eating an ice cream, there's nothing and no-one to stop you. You'd have to bring your own ice-cream, though. There's no gift shop.

The whole place is extremely chill. Laid back. Relaxed. On a gorgeously warm, sunny Spring morning it's hard to think of anywhere more so. I'd have liked to have had a thermos of coffee and a good book with me. I'd have lain down on one of the flat stones and basked.

With Beryl not being allowed past the gate, we couldn't do anything like that, sadly, so we went to the pub instead. And in the pub garden are three more standing stones, a thousand years older than the circle, so it's said, although how they're dated I don't know.

Those stones are known as The Cove and I didn't take any pictures of them. They're big, though, I can tell you that.

We had a coffee in the pub garden while Beryl frolicked in the grass. Didn't take any pictures of that, either. Sorry.

And then we came home. It was a fine morning's edutainment, although really, for me, the main pleasure of visiting pre-historic sites goes to the senses rather than the intellect. I like to touch them and imagine a connection to the deep past. 

I used to hug trees when I was a teenager. Too much prog rock, I expect. Lucky I grew out of that. Bloody hippies!

When you play games in which stone circles frequently feature, though, it is interesting to see such places up close. If nothing else, it gives some context.

I'm surprised the Druids of Norrath haven't installed any gift shops. Then again, now I come to think of it, I think there might  be the occasional vendor hanging out at one or two. I guess the barbed-wire fences are only a matter of time.

10 comments:

  1. I think I'll forgive you for no Beryl pics this time, especially given all of the other standing stone photos you took. The historian in me is fascinated by them, and my wife (the Geologist) would probably be all over those stones if she had the chance.

    Did I read right and that you thought that EQ ought to have a gift shop there?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now that would just be weird! No, I was suggesting the Druids in EverQuest, who use the standing stone rings as a form of teleportation, of which players of both druids and other classes get the benefit, might do well to set up gift shops at the stones to make some money out of all the adventurers passing through. And then I remembered some of the stones do have a druid or two standing around and I think a couple of them might be vendors, so actually they already do!

      Delete
  2. This is the one thing I envy about living in Europe. One feels so disconnected from history here in North America. The oldest buildings are usually not much more than a hundred years old. The indigenous peoples generally didn't build much that lasts, and even if they had my boorish ancestors would have probably just knocked it all down anyway. We're not even taught about pre-colonial history much, for obvious if despicable reasons.

    At least we've got some good museums in Toronto. I was at the Royal Ontario Museum not that long ago, and they have a pretty impressive collection of historical artifacts from Canada and around the world. Nothing you can touch, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In one of the novels I wrote back in the 90s (The unfinished one.) there's a an American character who comes to study in the UK and the first thing that hits her when she arrives at the city where she's going to study is how incredibly old everything is, what with the university having been around for eight hundred or so years at that point. Eight hundred years is nothing to how long those stones have been around, of course. The ones in the field are supposed to have been there for maybe 3000 years and the ones I forgot to photograph in the pub garden for a thousand years longer than that. It's hard to process those kinds of timescales, which is why I like to put my hands on the evidence.

      Delete
    2. When my son went over to Germany as part of a student exchange program in high school, the town he lived in had a "new church" that was 400 years old and the "old church" that was 800. Given that the "new church" was slightly younger than Jamestown, Virginia, that boggled the mind.

      Delete
  3. I love me some historical sites and ancient ruins. The oldest buildings I have been to here in the US were some native american ruins in New Mexico that were built around 800-900 years ago (no one is quite sure). The oldest human built thing I have seen here were serpent mounds that were built around 300 BC.

    The oldest ruins I have seen in person anywhere were almost certainly various bronze and roman age ruins in different parts of Israel. One of them was obscure enough that I am having trouble figuring out what it even was. We had to hike over a mile up a mountain to get to it. It was the ruins of a very old pagan temple. The whole complex, at least what had been excevated, was like four or five big rooms. The pictures on my phone show crumbling walls around a foot high. So not really impressive enough to be on a normal tour. My phone is also usually pretty good about figuring out where I am when I take pictures, this one it has no idea. I want to say it was four or five thousand years old, but since I can't find anything about it now who knows? I also did see a lot of stuff mentioned in the New Testament of course.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PS: I will definitely remember all this about trade-offs for visiting various stone circles if I am ever in England. I had never heard of those ruins or Avebury. I was suprised to see Avebury dividied up by roads and a village when I googled it. Of course it's also apparently huge. I wonder what it would have looked like around the time they built it.

      Delete
    2. I like visiting all kinds of ruins. They don't even need to be ancient. In fact, possibly the most interesting I ever visited were the abandoned buildings from the 1992 Seville Expo, which had only been left to decay for about five years. The very fact that they were so recent (And strange) and that nature was already reclaiming them made the whole place seem even more resonant, somehow.

      My real favorites are castles, which are at their best when they've fallen down a bit but not too much, so you can still get onto the walls and up the towers but they're clearly not fit to be lived in any more. There was an unfortunate tendency back in the 80s and 90s in some places to restore them to something like their original condition, which kind of misses the point, I think.

      Once you get back to pre-Common Era times, you're often down to the foundations, which requires quite a bit of imagination. Some of the Roman ruins are in pretty good nick but I think those are mostly from the first few centuries AD. I think the oldest actual buildings, as opposed to stone monoliths and circles, that I've seen are the ones on Malta, which apparently pre-date the Pyramids and even Stonehenge. It was very busy when I went, though - Malta is a small island and often quite crowded - and it was hard to get much of a sense of the time that had passed. That tends to work better in isolation, I think.

      Delete
    3. I had to look up the temples in Malta. Very cool, that is on my bucket list now :-)

      As an aside, I have been to France several times, the Middle East and New Zealand, but never to England. There is so much stuff I want to see there if I can ever make it over. I would probably need separate trips for Scotland, Ireland and London to see everything I'd like to.

      Delete
    4. I've been to Native sites in Ohio (Serpent Mound, Sunwatch Village, and Fort Ancient) so I guess there's that. But I'd still love to visit Pueblo sites in the Southwest. I doubt I'll ever get a chance to visit outside the country anytime in the next few decades, however. (Costs and health and all that.)

      Delete