Showing posts with label Young Sheldon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Young Sheldon. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Beginnings And Endings


Since I started using AI to make music, earlier in the year, my TV viewing, like my gaming, has taken a nose-dive. I was up to about a couple of hours a day, mostly last thing every night, but now I spend that time on my laptop, burning through Credits on Suno and stitching fragments together into songs in Audacity.

I'm still paying several subscriptions to streaming services all the same, though, so I feel obligated to make at least some use of all of them. We did pause Netflix for three months but I re-started it for Wednesday (And happily caught the finale of Upload around the same time.)

While I was looking through the schedules for more to watch, so as to get my money's-worth, I noticed the missing seasons of couple of shows I had been following a few months ago had miraculously appeared. 

One of them was Roswell: New Mexico, for which Netflix very annoyingly had held the license to Seasons 1 and 2 in the UK but not Seasons 3 and 4, which were exclusive to Sky over here a the time (If I remember right...). That was great but also too late because, when I finished the first two seasons, I didn't want to pay yet another sub so I used a VPN to watch them on Netflix USA.

Even more annoying was Young Sheldon, for which Netflix had the rights to stream six out of seven seasons in both the UK and the US but no rights to the final season for either. That was on some US station or service I forget now. All I do remember about it was that I couldn't watch it, even with a VPN.

Well, that agreement, whatever it was, must be over now because Netflix has the full run available to stream. I was finally able to catch up with the show. I'll tell you what I thought of it later.

Our other streaming service is Amazon Prime but that one pays for itself in shipping alone, particularly since Mrs. Bhagpuss buys at least one thing on Amazon pretty much every day. What with that and the games and music offers included in the bundle, I feel no urge to watch anything on Prime at all if I don't feel like it. 

The problem there is that I also have Apple+ through Prime as an add-on. It was very cheap for three months and I didn't really care if I was watching anything on Apple+ or not but now it's back up to full price it seems like I should at least watch something. Mrs Bhagpuss doesn't currently watch anything on the channel at all so it's up to me to pick up the slack. 

Luckily, there's no shortage of good stuff to choose from. I thought about starting several series about which I'd heard good things - Severance, Slow Horses, Foundation, The Studio - but in the end I decided on Ted Lasso. Main reason: the episodes were shorter. Secondary reason: I like sitcoms.

I have now watched all of Young Sheldon Season 7 and Ted Lasso Season 1. The end of one story, the start of another. Here's what I thought about them both.

Young Sheldon - Season 7

I was quite dubious about the whole concept of Young Sheldon to begin with. I've never been a huge fan of prequels (Is anyone?) and prequels built around main characters as children can come across as a bit desperate. Added to that, this is just one character from an ensemble show, one that relies almost entirely on the particular skills of the specific actor who played him, and it's a character often considered to be difficult and controversial. 

The prospects didn't look good but contrary to expectations it turned out to be a warm, comfortable, enjoyable watch. A lot less spiky and brittle than the show that spawned it, in fact.

Of course, it also had one other, major problem, something common to all long-running shows that revolve around a young child. Children grow up. 

In one respect, that worked in Young Sheldon's favor. Old Sheldon, if we can call him that, is a divisive figure in The Big Bang Theory. A lot of people have some very valid objections to the character in terms of the way it can appear to promote and perpetuate some stereotypically negative views of neuro-diversity. I personally feel the full character arc, taken across the entire run of the show, counters many of those objections, producing a nuanced and distinctly positive image of someone struggling with numerous challenges they find it hard to overcome.

Even if that's true, though, you'd need to have watched the entire 279 episodes to appreciate it. And no-one who thinks Sheldon is an offensive caricature is going to sit through 93 hours of a show that makes their skin crawl just to see if maybe it wasn't quite as bad as they thought it was after all. As the saying goes, that's an awful lot of Shawshank before you get to the Redemption.

I didn't think Young Sheldon had the same level of difficulty. In TBBT, there are five central characters and it's not hard to make an argument that all of them are potentially offensive in the way they're written and performed. Young Sheldon just has... young Sheldon. And he's kinda cute. 

All those mannerisms and affectations that seem so mannered and performative in an adult seem a lot softer and more relatable in a child. Kids, after all, do say and do the darnedest things, don't they? And it is undeniably satisfying, if you've watched a lot of TBBT, to see many of Sheldon's tropes and foibles from that show get their start in some specific event in this one, usually for an understandable and sympathetic reason.

All of that is in the show as a whole, though. What about the final season? 

Well, the most striking thing about it is that Sheldon isn't actually in it all that much. He's in every episode but he's rarely the central character and the main story arcs seldom revolve around him. He's almost a peripheral character at times, chipping in with a few side-stories or popping up to add some extra perspective to someone else's story.

Mostly, it's about his family, all of whom get some significant character development that changes or enhances what we knew about them. For example...

(This bit might get a bit spoilery from here on down...)

Meemaw really starts to show her age as she loses her home, her business and her freedom all in quick succession. Her veneer of invincibility begins to peel away and her indomitable spirit wilts a little. Missy shows a good deal of unexpected maturity and character growth as does Georgie, albeit each in very different ways. Sheldon's mother's religious beliefs start to move her closer to the mania seen in the adult show, while his father... dies.


That was a shock, even though if I'd been counting the passage of time I ought to have expected it. It happens right towards the end of the run, just when everything seems to be going pretty well for him and the family. 

I was not best pleased when it happened, not only because I liked the character as played by Lance Barber but because I had Young Sheldon firmly in my "Send me off to sleep in a good mood." slot and it seemed like it was going to finish with a couple of episodes where all the cast would be in mourning and filled with grief. Not what I want, right before I nod off.

In the end, though, the whole thing was handled very gently, not side-stepping the emotions but not losing the warmth and humor either. It was a particularly telling way to show some of Sheldon's emotional growth or lack of it, too, something I also thought was well-handled.

As a run, I'd call Young Sheldon a success. It lasted seven seasons, which is more than decent for a sitcom. It kept the whole cast together and it was consistently written and well-played throughout by an excellent ensemble cast. It was great to see Annie Potts and Ed Begley Jr. in meaty roles again, too. 

The underlying problem of child actors turning into adult actors was kept to a minimum by the unusual expedient of partially writing the lead character out of his own show. Missy and Georgie both seemed to age at a rate that allowed the audience barely to notice it happening but by Season 7, Iain Armitage, playing Sheldon, looked very odd indeed, like a much older child playing a much younger one.

The same mannerisms that had made him a cute-if-quirky kid turned him into a slightly disturbing adolescent, never changing his expression, keeping his hands stiffly by his sides and always wearing awkwardly formal clothes. That looks funny in an eight-year old but uncomfortable and unsettling in a teenager. It's not surprising they mostly wrote around him towards the end.

The ensemble cast was uniformly excellent. I liked everyone, which is ideal for a sitcom. I especially enjoyed Annie Potts as Meemaw and her double act with Craig T Nelson as her lover, Dale, was always a joy. The entire cast - and it's a big one counting all the regular supporting parts - was on top form throughout and possibly the highest praise I can offer is that, by the end of the final season, I think I liked every one of the characters more than I had at the start.

Actually, the highest praise I can offer is that I'd happily watch the whole run again. Which I almost certainly will.

Ted Lasso - Season 1 

I'd heard a little about this show. I'd heard it was heart-warming, upbeat and positive. I'd heard it was nice. I also knew it was about a sports coach and, of course, that it was an American sitcom. When I was looking for something to replace Young Sheldon, it seemed like another sweet slice of Americana to send me off to sleep smiling.

Yeah. About that...

It's not "nice", is it?  It's not all that sweet either. It's acerbic and sharp and occasionally even a little bitter. Ted Lasso (The character no the show.) is irony personified.

For one thing, he may be American and a sports coach but he's not in America and he's not coaching an American sport. Somehow, in all the things I'd read, I hadn't picked up on the "Sit" in the sitcom, which is that he's in London, coaching at a Premier League football club.

Or, rather, managing one, which I'm not sure they ever actually say. Everyone keeps calling him "Coach" but he's doing the job we usually call "Manager" over here and he has an actual coach standing next to him, who everyone also calls "Coach". 

The show is full of oddnesses like that. I'd say it does 98% of a great job of being as convincing about life in modern Britain as 98% of British sitcoms can manage but the 2% differences are wholly different in each case.

The writing doesn't actually lean that heavily into the one-language-two-cultures comedy you'd expect. There's plenty of that around the margins but it's never the point of the show. Ironically, that makes the moments when cultural infelicities do pop up all the more obvious. 

For example, there's some considerable business in several episodes about American sport not accepting a tie as a valid result. Which is fine. Except that we don't really use the expression "tie" all that much over here.

Ted always uses the word "tie" in Season 1. Every British or British-localized speaker he uses it to uses it back to him, frequently when no-one here would ever use the word in that way. We'd almost always say "draw", which is what we call a sports match where the scores end up tied.  We use tie as a verb routinely but rarely as a noun.  

In fact, just to make it even more confusing, a "tie" as a noun in a sporting comment usually means a fixture or a match. As in "a cup tie". But then, a draw can be a fixture, too, as in "We got Chelsea in the next round - that's a tough draw.

I can see how it could be confusing but I'm not even that into sports and it's all just second-nature to me because I grew up here. When the word-choices don't ring true, it's distracting. And clearly I'm not the only one who noticed because, in the first episode of Season 2, when ties/draws become a big plot point, both words are used and a context for the different usage is established. It's just a shame they didn't think of that in Season 1.

All of which might seem like nit-picking but it's a real nit-picking kind of show. It's full of little bits of business about cultural differences and expectations and about how sports teams operate, all of which revolve around nuances of language and fine details of procedure or practice.

I found all that quite engaging. And enlightening.

For example, a while back, Wilhelm posted something on TAGN about bottled water and I left a comment in which I referred to drinking carbonated bottled water, to which Wilhelm pointed out that Americans generally wouldn't see much point in drinking fizzy water - they'd just drink soda if they wanted fizz. 

I did not know that. Despite having steeped myself in Americana, second-hand, through comics, books, TV, music and movies since I was a child, I had never come across the idea that sparkling water was un-American. And now here it is as a running gag in Ted Lasso, where he keeps being given glasses of water to drink and he takes a huge swig, expecting it to be plain, then spits it all over himself or someone else because it turns out to be sparkling. Who knew? 

There's plenty like that but the strength of the show isn't so much in the jokes as the characters. Or perhaps I should say the caricatures, which is what they seem like, at least in the first few episodes. It takes a good while before the nuances and subtleties begin to reveal themselves or, I ought to say, are revealed by the writers. 

And by the end of the season, I still wasn't sure just how much depth lay beneath most of the surfaces. The hints at anything more are so brief, so fleeting, it sometimes felt as though I was imagining them. Keeley is a bit older and smarter than she seems, Coach Beard has some quite peculiar-sounding sexual history, Jamie Tartt has an overbearing dad...

Even as I try to tally those glimpses of character, though, I realize how little is really there. Everything is suggestion, misdirection, sleight-of-hand. After ten episodes, how much do we really know about anyone? Not much more than you could write on an index card.

Except, maybe, for Ted. He has some depths and they are, largely, hidden. Not from the audience, who get to see him alone in his apartment at night, but from everyone around him.

To everyone else, he's relentlessly upbeat but it doesn't seem to have gotten him all that far. He coached one successful season of what I think must have been college football and then got head-hunted by a vengeful divorcee in the expectation his skills would not be transferable and he would be a disaster as the "coach" of a top-flight club in the English Premier League, whose prospects she hoped to damage so as to upset her (Unbearable.) ex.

Meanwhile, that very same relentlessly upbeat tendency is revealed as the proximate cause of Ted's own impending divorce. He's so fucking nice his wife can't stand to be around him any more.

Surprised by that swear-word I just threw in, seemingly so unnecessarily? That's the show. It does that All. The. Time. It's another thing I wasn't expecting. When someone tells you a sitcom is really nice and the main character is really nice and "nice" is the word you hear associated with it more than any other, you're probably expecting something along the lines of a live-action Wallace and Grommit. Not a swear-fest. Which is what you get.

It's a really sweary show. Everyone says "fuck" all the time. Except Ted. Who also says it but only when it matters. Unlike over-the-hill superstar Roy Kent, who has a series of running gags revolving around the F-word, which he uses at every opportunity and in front of anyone including, repeatedly and hilariously, his niece and a bunch of her eight-year old pals. The funniest thing about it is his complete unawareness that it's not entirely acceptable behavior. He ends up dropping a bunch of F-bombs in his first post-footballing career gig as a TV pundit, which predictably endears him to the audience, if not the presenters. (Although that's at the start of Season 2 so I shouldn't mention it here...)

I do like me some good, creative swearing, so it's a plus point as far as I'm concerned. And Roy's probably my favorite character, unless that's Keeley.

It's a good show, sweary or not. I'm not quite convinced it's a great show, the way it seems to have been pitched in some of the things I've read about it, but it's funny and the characters are likeable and it has that hard-to-resist sports narrative running in the background all the time, where even though it's all made up, you still want to know whether the team is going to win or not.

Just let's not talk about the actual footballing scenes. Has any show ever got those right? I doubt it. Some of them here have been quite painful to watch, and as I say I'm not even a sports fan.

I am a sitcom fan, though, and this is a good one. I'm on Season 2 now and I notice, looking ahead, that the episodes are longer throughout. I'm guessing that means more plot and deeper characterization rather than more jokes but I'll be happy, either way.

Tuesday, August 29, 2023

Situation Normal


Back at the beginning of Blaugust I posted a list of TV shows I was in the middle of watching. To recap, the shows were:

  • Good Omens 2
  • Two Broke Girls
  • Edens Zero
  • Young Sheldon
  • The Owl House
I have now finished all of them except for Young Sheldon, although in this context "finishing" Edens Zero meant getting to the end of Season One. I want to watch Season Two but I clearly don't want to watch it that much because the very low bar of swapping over to Crunchyroll has so far proven too high for me.
 
As for The Owl House, until someone green-lights another series, which will happen one day, I think I've probably said all I want to say about show for now. There are four Owl House episodes of the Disney series Chibi Tiny Tales I haven't yet seen, though... 
 
  Two Broke Girls

I do have something more to add to my earlier observations on Two Broke Girls. The show remained admirably consistent  throughout. It started with a ridiculous premise and a complete abnegation of any kind of logic or reason and kept up those stellar standards for the whole six seasons. Every time anything threatened the "sit", like the girls actually making enough money to stop being broke, the "com" asserted its authority and reset things to where they needed to be. I found that adhesion to the ur-concept in the face of all attempts to insert the least element of realism into the show to be one of its greatest strengths.

It's also a show that relies to the heaviest degree on repetition. Most of the humor comes from internal references and running gags. One of the tropes of the show that I particularly liked is the cash register that pops up at the end of every episode to show exactly how much money the girls have saved. 
 
In Season One, Caroline sets a target of $250k as the sum required to turn Max's Homemade Cupcakes into a viable business. At the time it seems like an unlikely goal but thanks to the sale of Caroline's backstory to Hollywood (Probably the most realistic and believable plot in the entire six seasons.) there is a point at which the cash register dings up a quarter of a million dollars. Which, of course, disappears as fast as it arrived. 
 
The girls both have significant relationships, the show being sporadically and in some small part a romcom, all of which are, inevitably and for sound plot reasons, doomed to failure. Perhaps the one fortuitous outcome of the unexpected cancellation of the series is that the final episode closes with Max engaged to be married to her wealthy lawyer lover and Caroline in a firmly committed relationship with her working-class, Italian-American boyfriend.
 
It's absolutely guaranteed that, had the series continued, neither of those relationships would have neatly folded away into happy-ever-after but because the series ends where it does it's entirely possible to imagine that's what happened next. It makes for an oddly satisfying ending. I came away content.
 


Good Omens 2

This is an interesting one. I should probably issue a trigger warning for fans of the show before I get started.
 
That does make it sound like I must have hated it but that's far from the case. I enjoyed it quite a bit. I just didn't think it came anywhere close to being either as funny or as compelling as the first season.

I remember Season One as being quite complex. It had a lot of characters and a number of sub-plots, all of which were fairly coherently coaxed together into a finale that made some kind of sense of and brought some kind of resolution to all of them. It felt quite novelistic, with its long-form heritage making itself evident throughout. If anything, it might have been a bit baggy. It certainly never felt like it was in any kind of a hurry.

Season Two, by comparison, felt short, rushed and incomplete. I found it quite unsatisfying at times, particularly during the zombie episode, which made some sense emotionally but just seemed to be quite badly done. I don't like zombies at the best of times but comedy nazi zombies are really too much to take for a whole episode.

The core of the show is, of course, the relationship between the two central characters, the angel Aziraphale and the demon Crowley, as portrayed so deliciously by Michael Sheen and David Tennant. In the first season the performances of the two stars are exemplary but in the follow-up I never felt quite the same chemistry between them. In narrative terms, the relationship only becomes more complex but on the screen it seemed just very slightly flat. 
 

The cast as a whole is very good, with Jon Hamm appearing to enjoy himself perhaps even more than he should as the memory-wiped archangel, Gabriel. All the newly-introduced characters are interesting and/or endearing, my particular favorite being Muriel, a somewhat naive, not to say dim, angel played to perfection by Quelin Sepulveda

The problem from my perspective wasn't really with the quality, for once, but the quantity. As I started watching the fifth and final episode I literally had to pause the stream and check it was the last one. It seemed the whole thing had barely gotten started before it was over. 

And yet, rushed as it felt, it also seemed as though too few ideas had been stretched too thin. It was a very odd sensation, to be left wanting more but not being able to say more of what. 
 
I have a suspicion Good Omens 2 is one of those shows that might make a stronger impression on a second watch than a first. I suspect much of my dissatisfaction stems from expectations created by my fuzzy recollections of Season One. I don't think the two seasons are as consistent in tone as I would have anticipated. Season Two would probably benefit from being judged separately rather than in comparison. 

Whether I will ever watch it again is another matter. I can readily imagine re-visiting Season One but I think it's going to be a good while before I regenerate any enthusiasm for another sit-down with the sequel.
 
Which just leaves...
 

 
Young Sheldon

Young Sheldon is, of course, a sitcom based on the character played by Jim Parsons in The Big Bang Theory. There's a lot I could say about the show already but I'll hold back on most of it until I've finished the run. I do have a few notes, though...

I'm going to say up front that I really like The Big Bang Theory. I know that's a controversial stance to take in many quarters. I've read a number of blog posts and web articles about why and how the show is disrespectful to the various communities who see themselves stereotyped and ridiculed by its characters and storylines and I don't fundementally disagree with some of those interpretations and reactions.

The thing, I think, that almost all of those analyses omit to recognize is that most sitcoms are reliant on stereotypes, which they ridicule. It underpins the whole genre to some considerable degree. 
 
I suspect the issues some have with this particular sitcom stem from an unfamiliarity with the form as a whole. As I was reading some of the commentary, it was noticeable how often the alalysis was prefaced by an assertion that the writer didn't usually watch sitcoms, or not sitcoms like this, successful, popular, mainstream, network half-hour shows. I also suspect that being confronted with a stereotype someone feels might be applied to themself makes that person less amenable to finding said stereotype amusing.  Few people appreciate being seen as the butt of a joke. 
 
What good sitcoms do, however -  and I would argue The Big Bang Theory is a good sitcom - is to make stereotypes feel more nuanced over time. Good writing and especially sympathetic or complex performance can cause a general audience to warm to personalities they would otherwise shun, simply by allowing viewers to get to know the characters as individuals, not just as representatives of a type. 
 

I'm considerably more inclined to listen to the arguments of those who seek to explain why the writing or acting in TBBT fails to open up the stereotypes it plays upon, thereby revealing the human beings inside, rather than those of the faction that thinks the show fails out of the gate just by trading in stereotypes in the first place. There's a very supportable case to be made that the writing and acting across the long run of the show is inconsistent, self-indulgent and sometimes lazy. Not every episode is good, let alone great.
 
Even though I very much enjoyed the parent show, however, I did not immediately warm to the idea of a spin-off featuring its most obviously annoying character as a ten-year old. It seemed to me that the kind of manic self-absorption exhibited by the adult Sheldon Cooper, manifesting primarily as it often does as a collection of tics and tropes, while it might be humourous in an adult character, would most likely be just disturbing and uncomfortable in a child.

For that and other reasons I didn't rush to find out if the writers managed somehow to avoid the very obvious pitfalls of the concept. It was only a combination of a gap in my sitcom dance card and a news item that said the show was - astonishingly - starting its sixth season that got me take it out of my watchlist and actually start watching it.

Honestly, it was the six seasons thing that did it. I just couldn't believe it had lasted that long. We all know how mercilessly fast shows get canned these days. For any show to get that far had to mean there was something there worth checking out.

There is and it's very simple. Like Two Broke Girls, Young Sheldon is just a plain, old-fashioned classic sitcom. There's nothing remotely fancy or clever about it. It relies wholly on sound charecterisation, consistent writing and some very solid acting by a strong, ensemble cast.

As with many of the best sitcoms, there's an extended family at the center. The set-up is instantly recognizeable no matter that most of the viewers will never have set foot in East Texas. All the storylines revolve around the usual quotidian concerns of growing up, going to school, making friends, working and getting along with the neighbors. 

The two things that most suprised me about the show, of which I have now seen the first two seasons, were firstly how unfocused on the titular character it is and secondly on how quickly it foregrounds Sheldon's meemaw, superbly played by the wonderful Annie Potts. If I didn't know the provenance of the show, I might have assumed she was the well-known character from a previous success, around whom a spin-off had been built.
 
Two seasons in, no-one appears to have aged. I am curious to see how that changes. One of the big problems all successful sitcoms starring child actors face is how to keep the storylines cute as the actors grow less so.
 
It's a particularly pointed issue in this show because Sheldon is already running well ahead of the usual  developmental markers. He's a ten year-old in high school, being courted by Universities. There's already been a storyline concerning the difference between his intellectual and emotional maturity and how it predicates against him moving away from home to take up the opportunities already coming his way. That's not going to work so well when he's fourteen, which I assume he will be by Season Six. 

Or maybe the whole thing doesn't unfold in real time. I can't say I've been keeping track. Maybe he'll be ten until the show ends and we'll just have to look at him like we look at the adult actors playing high school kids in Grease; with wilful suspension of disbelief.

It's not something I need to think about just yet. I have four more seasons to watch before I get there. I'll keep whatever observations I may have on what I see along the way for another time. For now, I'll just say it's another good sitcom. I'm enjoying it.
 

Glancing ahead, my current viewing slate looks like this:
  • Young Sheldon
  • Arrested Development
  • Carole and Tuesday
  • Captain Fall
  • Riverdale
Where last time everything was on Amazon Prime, this time it's all on Netflix. Again, I don't think that means anything, other than that obviously one streaming channel isn't enough any more.

I'll get to my thoughts on those shows when I get there. I also have a post I've been wanting to do for weeks now about Cannon Busters, a show I finished watching a good while back. I'm not sure I ever even mentioned it until now. 

So many shows; so much to say about them all; so little time to get it done.
Wider Two Column Modification courtesy of The Blogger Guide