Back in the '90s, after I finally got my voluntary redundancy from the very large company I was working for at the time, I took a year off . Didn't do very much with it, other than rest, relax and have a pleasant time until the money ran and I had to find another job. Hey, it was the nineties, okay? You've all seen Slacker, right? If not, you should. Someone put it up on YouTube in 2017 and it's still there so if you want to go watch it now, I can wait.
Anyway... way to derail my own post, right? So, the point is I had all this time off and one of the things I was going to do with it was write a novel. Only it turns out I don't have a novel in me. How about that? Everyone but me, huh?
What I did have in me, it turned out, was a whole freakin' mess of characters, their never-ending soap-opera-drama, and some kind of ramshackle, rambling narrative that wasn't going anywhere or at least not anywhere I could follow. I just used to sit down at the PC I'd bought specially to write the thing and go into what I can only describe as some kind of trance and come out of it two or three hours later with a few thousand words that, when I read them back, seemed to be nothing to do with me. I had no idea how I'd done it. I still don't.
I'm not saying it was like automatic writing in the days of Conan Doyle but it was freaky as hell and it really took it out of me. It took me about a week to recover so the whole thing moved quite slowly. Still, after a year I had something tens of thousands words in two unconnected "stories". There was some kind of shape to both of them but if either had an actual plot, I couldn't have told you what it was.
And then I had to get another job and I started to use the PC to play video games, discovered EverQuest, and that was that for a quarter of a century. All of which I believe I've covered here before, not that I fool myself anyone is likely to remember.
While I was writing them, though, those stories, if that's what we're going to call them, didn't just sit on a floppy disk on a shelf. They did do that but they also came out in bimonthly installments in the apazine to which I belonged, meaning they were nominally public, with a theoretical readership of thirty people, assuming everyone bothered to read them. Again, something I've written about before and not the point of this post so let's move on.
What is the point of this post? You may well ask. It's this: I still have all that stuff, both the writing and its physical manifestation in photocopied zines. Of course I do. I still have freakin' everything I've ever done, going back to my exercise books from primary school (They're in the loft.). I never throw anything away.
I mentioned in a recent post that I'd been mining a couple of fragments I wrote around the same time for lyrics to turn into songs to feed into the all-devouring AI maw. That turned out really well. I mean really well. I spun those two short pieces up into a seven song cycle and I'm about as happy with it as I could be, which, since tend I love my own stuff to a positively nauseating degree to begin with, is irritatingly predictable.
If you want to judge for yourself, I made a playlist. I think they're all pretty good. Your opinion may differ. I'd still like to hear it though.
After the seventh song, even I could tell the well was pretty much dry. Which was when I had my next big idea. Basically, the same big idea but who's telling this? If I'd been able to get seven songs out of a couple of short fragments, how many could I get out of two short novels?
I don't know yet but I've done four so far and once again I'm very pleased with what I've got. Given I'm finding the process addictive as hell and the results astonishingly satisfying, there could be a lot more. There will be a lot more.
And we're still not at the final point of this post, the lede of which I've buried all the way down here as a reward for the patient, the stubborn and the determined. Here it is: blogging is great and all and I love it but I'm not sure it's as aesthetically satisfying as what came before.
Here's why.


Only it turns out I don't have a novel in me. How about that? Everyone but me, huh?
ReplyDeleteWell, I'm not any better. I think there's a novel in me, but my brain gets in the way of that.
As for why physical zines mean more than blogs, I believe there's multiple things at play. For one thing, we've been conditioned since youth to value physical things over the virtual. A real person over a virtual one, for example. Of course, that does deviate into the "what is meant by virtual?" morass, especially with the rise of AI as opposed to people you interact with in social media. (And whether that person on the other end of social media is a bot or not.) For another, when you say you're "published", having an actual printed copy that you can hand to another person and show off your work is far more impactful than giving someone a link or an epub file. That physical work can't be edited by someone else and then passed around as belonging to another person without a lot of manual labor.
My feelings on virtual (As opposed to digital, which can also be physical.) content have changed a lot in the past few years. I used to think it was pretty much inevitable that the physical would fall out of use for most things that aren't either practical or luxurious. It seemed so obviously more convenient to have most forms of entertainment and information in instantly accessible, hugely condensed form that I found it hard to imagine anyone growing up with that as a possibility wouldn't automatically prefer it.
DeleteTo some extent that's turned out to be true but there seems to be mounting evidence that it's the digital natives who are starting to feel disatisfied with not having memories they can hold in their hands. You do have to ask how much that has to do with the careless attitude of the custodians of digital content but even if that wasn't an issue I am now wondering if there isn't just some innate need for touch that isn't being sufficiently satisfied by tapping screens.
Martin Atkins has plenty to say about physical media -- merch. ;)
Delete-- rlsy7
Props for the still from American Graffiti in one of those shots. That movie had a crazy impact on myself and my friends as we tried our best to bring back the 'cruising' lifestyle in our tiny little town.
ReplyDeleteI was only 13 but had a 17 year old step-brother who had been giving my older brother's 1968 Mustang and we'd ride around looking for other people who were riding around so we could... I dunno, wave or something. But the gas crisis put a big crimp on that.
Though on the other hand, hanging out in the line to buy gas became it's own social experience. The lines were so long and moved so slowly that we'd get out and throw a frisbee around or something and... yeah, an image sure can trigger nostalgia unrelated to the post topic!!!! :)
This post was originally going to have the covers and a paragraph for each of them explaining the provenance of the image and its relavance to the story. Unfortunately, it turns out I can't remember exactly where I got a couple of them and I'd have to re-read the whole thing to know what the connections to most of the images are. I mean, I have a fair idea but I'd need to confirm it.
DeleteI did immediately know the American Graffitti one, though., both where it's from and why I picked it and it's oddly relevant to the way your comment spins off into something inspired by but unrelated to the main thrust of the post. That picture reminded me of three characters who turned up halfway through the story and all but took over for a while. They're trying to start a band and they just happen to be in the same bar as some of the other characters, the ones the narrative was following, and as soon as they appeared I found I kept writing about the background characters instead of the foreground.
And now they're the ones I'm picking for the songs so I guess they just have something about them...
Also, cool story about you and your step-brother. That sounds like it would have been very cool. Maybe you could whip it up into something...
There are a few of my posts I look back on with pride, but exactly zero of the images. Even in some of my recent image heavy posts, I put way more thought into the captions explaining what point I am trying to illustrate with a given image than I do into the images themselves.
ReplyDeleteThere is definitely something about blogs as a medium that tends to lack visual "umph" for lack of a better word. I'd put you at the top of a pretty short list, I often find images you have cooked up engaging.
Really like 1, 3, 7 and 8 btw.
Thanks! I think zine culture in general has always been fairly visual. Certainly more so than blog culture. My experience was certainly colored by being in APAs with a lot of visual artists and people who could either draw really well or thought they could, but the punk and music zines i used to buy at gigs were also mostly quite visual as well. Quite a lot of bloggers, on the other hand, seem to take a positive pride in using few or no illustrations and in not being very design-oriented either. I think the long-form writing aspect is the attraction almost because there are so many other online ways to put your message across in video or sound.
Delete