A couple of hours ago, I had a post almost finished. I stopped so we could take Beryl for a walk. When I came back, I checked my feeds before finishing the post and saw on MassivelyOPthat Belghast had died.
I'm sure I don't need to clarify to anyone reading this who Belghast was. I probably don't need to explain how he'd been undergoing a difficult course of chemotherapy following a cancer diagnosis. Reportedly, it was complications with that course of treatment that led to his extremely untimely death.
Everyone who's likely to be reading this most likely followed Bel's blog, just like I do. We all learned about everything in his life, good and bad, through his conversational, very open posts. We all know he'd had the worst of years, with his wife dying suddenly and unexpectedly and then his own illness appearing.
But I imagine most of us were confident he'd get through all these very bad times and come out the other side, still Bel. Still himself. Still positive, forward-looking, optimistic, ready to give life the benefit even if it didn't seem to want to cut him much slack.
I knew from his posts that he was struggling with his chemo routine. I know from experience how difficult chemo can be like although my own experience was a lot milder than his. But I also know how unpredictable it can be, filling yourself with poisons week after week. Sometimes very bad things happen.
I had my own brush with death thanks to complications with chemo, as documented here on this blog. It's such a terrible shame Bel didn't survive his own to tell us all about the experience on his blog, too.
He would have, of course. He was a fearless examiner of his own life. He talked about all kinds of issues, practical, medical, emotional and personal on what was supposed to be a gaming blog. He was a core influence on my own move to make this blog about more than just games, although his willingness to share far exceeded my own.
But then Bel was ever the sharer. He tried to help wherever he could and he led always by example. His influence has been both deep and wide.
I knew Bel from his blog and also from Blaugust, of course, but he was very active in all kinds of social media and in gaming communities. He was always willing to talk to new people and turn them into friends, even though he didn't always find socializing easy, something he often mentioned on his blog.
A lot of people knew Bel. A lot of people are going to miss him. No-one's going to forget him easily, not least because his legacy will live on.
According to Roger, Blaugust is going ahead. I'm absolutely certain that's how Bel would have wanted it. I'm sure everyone will have plenty to say about the inspirational figure who started the whole thing when it rolls around again next month.
For now, though, I'll leave it at that. There's only so much you can say when something like this happens. I just hope someone's looking after Bel's cats. He really loved those cats.
I wasn't going to do anything to commemorate the death of Ozzie Osbourne.
But then I didn't have anything else in mind and I hate to skip a day when I'd
normally be posting...
And it is true that although I haven't listened to Sabbath for, oh, about half
a century and I've never heard any of Ozzie's solo stuff - ever - and I haven't
seen even a few seconds of The Osbournes... Black Sabbath was my first
favorite band.
Weird but true. For about five minutes (Okay, a year.) when I was in my very
early teens, my best friend and I thought Sabbath were the best band we'd ever heard. Of course, we didn't
exactly have the breadth or depth of musical experience we'd have by
the time were fifteen...
Anyway, I bought Masters of Reality when it came out in 1971 (Meaning I
must have been thirteen...) and then backfilled the first two albums,
Paranoid and Black Sabbath, which turned out to be very easy to
find in my favorite used record store. My pal bought Sabbath IV the
following year but by then I'd already moved on to kneel at the feet of the
Velvet Underground and the rest of their art-house ilk so heavy metal just wasn't pretentious enough for me any more.
There was no second coming for metal for me, either. I still don't much like any of it. My fling with the heavy stuff was
brief and left little impression. While I retain a nostalgic affection for
some of the prog bands I liked around the same time (Well, Yes mostly.
The rest I can do without.) I can't say I've ever felt the urge to go back and
listen to my old Sabbath albums. Which I still have, of course.
There is one song of theirs that I do still listen to, though. It's hard to beat in its
field and it seems to stand a little to one side of most of the rest of the
Sabs catalog. What's more, it's the only Black Sabbath song I'm likely to hear coming at me down the street from the bunch of buskers who "perform" on
weekends, fifty yards from the doorway of the bookshop where I work. (That
said, they did take a run at War Pigs once. I bet that didn't put much
in the bucket.)
Obviously I'm talking about Paranoid. Let's hear it one more time.
Paranoid - Black Sabbath
There they are on Top of the Pops in 1970. I don't remember seeing
them. It might be very slightly before I started watching the show or maybe I
was out that evening. Kicking a ball against a wall, probably.
I didn't actually realise Paranoid was a Top 40 hit. (Top 30 then, I think, actually... Top 40 came later.) Again, I think it just predates
my obsession with the weekly chart rundown. I'm slightly too young to have
been there for the start of Ozzie's career and I'm only ten years younger than
he was when he died.
There are many covers of Paranoid on YouTube and most of them are like you'd
expect. Not all of them, though.
Paranoid - Lonely Sock
Paranoid - Harp Twins
Paranoid - Cindy Und Bert
Paranoid (That She Mighteth Be A Witch)
Starshine Audio
Something there for everyone, I think.
Ozzie famously had a great sense of humor. I hope he'd be amused by at least a
couple of those.
Rest easy, Prince of Darkness and thanks for starting me on a lifetime of
listening to great music. Even if very little of it was yours.
When I wrote
something
about the deaths of Brian Wilson and Sly Stone a couple of
weeks ago, I began by saying I didn't want to get into the habit of posting
every time some significant performer or artist died because there are just
too damn many of them. It's an unfortunate artifact of decade after decade of
pop culture, a snowball rolling down the hill that's never going to stop.
I went on to say that I'd try to stick to "marking the departure of people, the news of whose death has some more than
usual personal resonance for me" and I do hope to stick to that, which is why I'm writing this post. Either
that or because I've got a half-decent anecdote. Could be both.
Almost the first thing I read this morning, when I started to go through my
entertainment news feeds, was that Mick Ralphs had died. The
news did not create a strong reaction. My first thought was a very mildly
nostalgic "Aww... Mick Ralphs died...", immediately followed by "I didn't know he was still alive." Not exactly visceral.
As I read the report on
Stereogum, it became apparent why I hadn't heard anything about Mick in a while. He
had a major stroke almost a decade ago and hadn't been active since. He was
"bedridden", in Stereogum's curiously Victorian phrase, until his death
at the age of 81.
Mick Ralphs doesn't have the name recognition of superstars like Brian Wilson
or Sly Stone but he was a founder-member of one of those bands who had their
fifteen minutes as "The Biggest Band in The World". That was back in
1974, when Bad Company's first album went quintuple platinum. I am very
much not remembering Mick today because of that. I didn't like Bad Company
then and they certainly haven't gotten any better with the benefit of time,
for all that this year will see their induction into the Rock Hall of Fame.
My affection for Ralphs rests wholly on the work he did before then, when he
was lead guitarist and co-songwriter with Mott the Hoople. At one
time, when I was in my mid-adolescence, Mott were close to being my favorite
band. Never quite, but always close.
As the obituaries are explaining today, Mick was with Mott long before they
settled on their idiosyncratic name. Mind you, the one they started with
wasn't much better. I knew they were called "Silence" before they were
called Mott but until today I didn't know they started out as "The Doc Thomas Group". Clearly this was in the days before focus-group marketing.
Whatever they were calling themselves, like most people, I only became aware
of their existence when longtime fan David Bowie chose to
sprinkle a little of his glitter dust over them in the form of
All The Young Dudes and production duties on the album of the same
name. That was in 1972, when I would have been about fourteen and just
emerging from my thankfully brief heavy metal and prog rock phase into the
sunlit uplands of art rock and New York sleaze.
I was also entering my cultural hunter-gatherer phase, something I have yet to
grow out of more than half a century later. Back in the early seventies the
pop culture slag heap was nothing like the environmental hazard to young minds
it is today but it was still pretty damn huge and I spent most of my free time
picking at it like a half-starved crow.
Having latched onto Mott thanks to one very catchy single, I proceeded to chase
down just about everything they'd done, which was a lot. They'd released four
largely unsuccessful albums and were on the verge of breaking up when Bowie
tossed them a lifeline.
Mick Ralphs plays at least some guitar on every Mott album, even the one
released after he left the band, but for the first half-dozen (Out of seven.)
he's the keystone of the group. Ian Hunter, recruited in 1969, almost
immediately became the face and de facto leader of the band but Ralphs was
always the heart, which was why, almost as soon as he left, the heart went out
of the band and they called it quits.
Or so it seemed from a fan's perspective, anyway. There's a lot of reportage
and personal testimony from the insider point of view that suggests a much
more complex narrative but I was a fan so I'll have it my way.
I can remember being pretty gutted when Mick left Mott, not least because at
that time I hadn't yet managed to see them live and now my chance at the
classic line-up was gone. Also, by then I'd bought and listened to most of the
back catalogue and it was pretty clear that, while Hunter was a great rock
lyricist, Mick had the best tunes.
Or so I thought at the time, although it's an analysis largely unsupported by
the evidence. My favorite Mott album has always been Wildlife,
their third and the one with the strongest country/folk feel. It's drenched
with Ralphs' unmistakable, ringing, lyrical lead guitar and that always led me
to think of it as an album filled with his compositions.
In fact, he wrote four tracks, Hunter three, and the rest is covers (Including
their version of Melanie's Lay Down, which suggests another
reason why I found her death
so affecting
a while back.) What's more, the tracks I like best on Wildlife
(Waterlow, Angel of Eighth Avenue) turn out, on investigation,
to be Hunter's, whereas Mick's contributions, particularly the opener,
Whisky Women, can be seen, with the benefit of hindsight, to
prefigure his much more commercially successful, yet much less aesthetically
pleasing, work with Bad Company.
All of which was just the kind of thing I filled my head with when I was in my
teens. Lucky for me the internet wasn't around back then or I'd probably never
have gotten out of the house.
As it was, I got out a lot and mostly what I got out to do was go to gigs. I
saw a lot of bands in the seventies and eighties, some of them many times, but
sadly I only got to see Mott the Hoople once and that was after Mick Ralphs
had left. They'd just released what was destined to be their last album, the
follow-up to their most commercially successful, Mott. They chose to
call it "The Hoople". No, it didn't seem like a great idea then,
either.
When it came time to tour the new album, Mick was off forming his supergroup
Bad Company with Paul Rogers, Simon Kirke at al and Mott were stuck
with the job of replacing him. As other bands have proved, successfully
replacing even a key founding member is not an impossible task but Mott really
fluffed it by bringing in Aerial Bender.
As you may have guessed, Aerial Bender was not the name he was given by his
parents, who knew him as Luther Grosvenor, which was also what he was
called when he played guitar in the not very well-remembered rock group
Spooky Tooth. Weirdly, Mick Ralphs was indirectly responsible for
Grosvenor's name change.
The scarcely-believable story, which also involves diminutive
singer-songwriter Lynsey de Paul, involves Ralphs walking down a street
in Germany, bending the aerials on a series of parked cars for reasons
unknown. Apparently Lynsey, who was there with the band following a German TV
appearance, used the phrase "aerial bender" about the incident in Ian
Hunter's hearing and for some inconceivable reason he remembered it and later
offered it to Grosvenor, who needed to work with Mott under a name other than
his own for contractual reasons.
For even more inconceivably, Grosvenor accepted the suggestion and that's what
he called himself for quite a while, even after his short stint with Mott was
over. He was still with them when I finally got to see them, though, and let's
just say he wasn't very good. Maybe it was an off night.
I was exceptionally unlucky to catch Mott in this short window of
mis-opportunity. Immediately after Bender departed, he was briefly replaced by
Mick Ronson so I missed the chance to see two of the best guitarists of
their generation live. Except I didn't.
When Mott broke up soon after Ronson joined them, he and Ian Hunter formed the
Hunter-Ronson Band, who I saw play live on their first UK tour. They
were excellent. A lot better than the dying Mott had been, except for one
moment in that gig - the encore.
In a scene that later came to feel like an eerie pre-echo of one in
Spinal Tap, after a not very impressive showing from Aerial Bender, an
assessment of their performance I remember being obvious from the stage if not
from the audience, Ian Hunter came to the mic to announce a very special guest
for the encore: Mick Ralphs. The audience's inevitable reaction must have been
very uncomfortable for the great man's stand-in.
So I did get to see the classic line-up or something closely approximating it
at least, if only for a couple of songs. Sadly, the brief appearance did not
lead to a Tufnel/St Hubbins style reunion for the band. Mick went back
to Bad Company and the immense commercial success it brought him, while Ian
Hunter left Mott to carry on pretty much as before, only without the hits. The
rest of Mott struggled on for a while without either of them then called it a
day until the inevitable re-union bandwagon brought various combinations back
together again in the new century.
By all accounts, Mick Ralphs was a jolly nice chap who played guitar really,
really well. He also wrote some good songs. He had a good voice too, when he
chose to use it. He made it big as a rock star without ever being anything
like a rock star but I don't think I'd be writing about him now, all these
years later, if it wasn't for the work he did with Mott in those five years at
the start of the seventies.
And especially if it wasn't for those few minutes at the end of one gig, when
his unexpected appearance really did make me feel like the roof of the venue
had opened up and the sun was shining down on me in a great ray of light from
heaven.
As I've said before, I don't really like to do a lot of tributes or obituaries for the simple reason that creative people
die all the time and I could quite easily record the passing of someone
significant two or three times every week. One thing I really don't want to
start doing is ranking celebrity deaths in order of importance until I have
some kind of amateur Hall of Fame thing going on.
Mostly I've stuck to marking the departure of people, the news of whose death
has some more than usual personal resonance for me, something I find quite
hard to predict or even, occasionally, to explain. For that reason, I wasn't
immediately motivated to post anything, when I saw a couple of days
ago that Sly Stone had died.
Sly Stone (and his eponymous "Family") is a bit of an outlier for me.
I'm not even sure I'd heard of him at all before I snuck in to see the
Woodstock movie when it had a brief cinema revival in the mid-seventies.
I can place that fairly precisely because it was rated 18 (Or in fact,
"X", I think, because we would still have been on the old letter-based
ratings then.) and I wasn't old enough to see it legally. I was close though.
I'm pretty sure I was seventeen. I remember it clearly because it was the only
X-film I ever lied about my age to see, which tells you everything you need to know about my
priorities as a teenager.
In the movie, Sly and the Family Stone are seen doing the now-classic
I Want To Take You Higher, which Rolling Stonejust this week
described as showcasing the power of live music "better perhaps than any other performance ever captured on film". It certainly had an impact on seventeen-year-old me because after that I
sure as hell knew who Sly Stone was.
It was probably also the moment when I realised I liked funk. Until then I
don't think I'd paid much attention to it at all. It was the mid-seventies by
then and funk was all over the radio. As a recovering prog and heavy metal fan
I was finding new musical interests in all directions, something the
supposedly barrier-breaking but actually frequently prescriptive punk
hierarchy strongly discouraged, as I was about to discover.
Didn't stop me listening to and enjoying all kinds of forbidden sounds, from
Joan Armatrading to the Hues Coroporation but for a while I did
learn to keep some of my less culturally acceptable tastes to myself. I don't
recall anyone ever compaining about me listening to Sly Stone, though. To have done so would have been be tantamount to admitting you were a cloth-eared philistine (Which, to be
fair, would have been a badge some people I knew then would have worn with
pride...)
So, I was still pondering on whether or not to say something about Sly's
passing, when someone else rolled over and stole Sly's thunder. Sly Stone was
a very major figure in the history of popular music, albeit he'd been off the pace for a long while, so it was going to take someone very big
to put him in the shade. And of course it was.
If we're talking western 20th century pop/rock canon, there aren't a lot of
names left alive bigger than Brian Wilson. When I was talking to Mrs Bhagpuss
about it, I described his demise as a Bob Dylan level event.
Bob, of course, is still happily and very actively with us, so maybe I could more accurately have referenced Bowie or Lennon but I already had Dylan in mind
because Mrs Bhagpuss had been telling me only the day before about
a video
she'd watched, going through the top musicians and bands he hated.
I haven't watched it myself. I know how these things go. I'm also way, WAY
more tolerant and accepting of all kinds of different music now than I was
fifty years ago and I bet Bob is too. I mean, he has to be or what the hell is
he doing acting as hype man for Machine Gun Kelly?
Anyway, most of Bob's pet peeves, as relayed to me by Mrs Bhagpuss, didn't
surprise me much - Coldplay, the Grateful Dead, the Eagles, Oasis...
there's a particular kind of monocultural blandness to them all that you might
expect would rile him up, but the one that really didn't fit the profile was
the Beach Boys.
For one thing, he seemed to be homing in on their early surf era, which is hardly the whole of their identity. Given that most of Bob's heavyweight contemporaries were falling over
themselves to praise the Beach Boys even when they were only singing
about cars and girls, even that seems odd. Post Pet Sounds, just about all the
critical traffic was headed in their direction, with the Beach Boys being widely
thought of as America's best answer to the Beatles, something openly
acknowledged by the Beatles themselves, especially when Paul McCartney called God Only Knows"the greatest song ever written", an opinion he seemingly still holds
today.
That conversation meant I'd already been thinking about the Beach Boys
and their legacy even before the sad news of Brian's death exploded all over the entertainment news feeds. And one thing I'd been thinking was that although
I'd never shared Bob's disdain for the band, I certainly used not to take them
any more seriously than he apparently did.
Unlike Sly Stone, I was very well-aware of the Beach Boys even before I was
old enough to start buying records or going to gigs. Those early-sixties
singles are very child-friendly, with their bouncy rhythms and cheery harmonies.
Plus Good Vibrations always sounded utterly weird whenever it came on
the radio. Who could forget that?
A curious thing that happened around the time punk began to take over my
attention in 1976 was that I started listening to a lot of 1960s bands I'd
never really bothered with before. Somewhat ironic considering the Clash's proclamations about "No Elvis, Beatles or the Rolling Stones" in 1977. There was a very simple reason for it: if
you wanted to listen a lot of short, loud, fast, songs back then, you'd run out in about half an hour if all you had was a stack of punk singles. There just weren't enough yet.
Which is how my punk-inflected pals and I ended up listening to a lot of
sixties r&b, early Who, Tamla, US garage bands and...
the Beach Boys. I played the hell out of a copy of the
Beach Boys Greatest Hits I picked up second-hand around then and the
whole vibe seemed to fit right in. A lot better than all that dub reggae that
got the official punk stamp of approval anyway, that's for sure.
Even then, though, I never thought of the Beach Boys as having any gravitas.
In the 'eighties I developed a theory, which I would occasionally expound at
parties if anyone put a Beach Boys track on the stereo, that only men liked
the band. For some reason the band's obsession with sports, automobiles and
objectifying women (Or "Girls", as they would have it.) seemed archetypally male to me. Plus I had more than once heard women express distaste for the band or even
ask for Beach Boys records to be taken off if they were playing, so it seemed
like a safe position to take.
Eventually I did meet women who really liked the Beach Boys so I abandoned that
one. I had a lot of strongly-held musical opinions in those days but I was always happy to give them up and make up new ones. Few survived for long, I'm happy to say. (Simply Red
are still crap but that's not an opinion, just a fact.)
The Beach Boys as major figures in contemporary music, though? That one took a
looong time come through. I don't think I even began to notice that
anyone was taking them seriously until the 'nineties and it took me a few
years of reading that "Pet Sounds" (Consistently ranked #2 in Rolling
Stone's influential Top 500 Albums list.), or maybe "Smile" or
"Smiley-Smile", might be the greatest album of all time before I
thought maybe I should find out what any of them sounded like.
I still don't have much of an opinion on that. Certainly not an informed one. I suspect it's one of those "You had to be there" things and although, technically, I was there, I would have been eight when
Pet Sounds came out, which is probably a bit young to appreciate its
subtleties.
In fact, embarassing though it is to admit it, I still have never sat down and
listened to any of those three albums all the way through. I've almost
certainly heard every track at some time or another but the only Beach Boys
albums I've ever owned are the aforementioned Greatest Hits and the really
excellent early seventies album "Surf's Up", which I do love, although
by then Brian was already having issues and his influence over the album isn't
as all-consuming as it once would have been.
For all of the above reasons, I wasn't going to do a tribute to Brian
Wilson either. Also, it's interesting that throughout this piece I've been
implicitly suggesting he and the band are interchangeable, when of course
there were other songwriters in the mix. It's always Brian Wilson that
everyone thinks of in that context though, isn't it? That's where the Beach
Boys differ from their friendly rivals the Beatles or even from the
Rolling Stones, where the other Brian (Jones, that is.) used sometimes
to be cast in a similar role, until he made the mistake of dying young and leaving Jagger and Richards the field.
This morning, despite my reservations, I thought maybe I would do something
after all and as you can see I followed through on that thought. And as usual it's ended up being much more about me than them. But then, that's just a sign that they had some definite impact on my life, I guess. It would be worse if I just rehashed their biographies, like one of those vicars at a funeral who never met the deceased.
I don't
really want to just slap up three or four of either of their top tunes,
which would be extremely easy to do since they both wrote so many absolute
bangers (Not, I imagine, the term either of them would have used and, to be
strictly accurate, I don't think it's controversial to suggest Brian wrote a lot more bangers than Sly.)
Instead, I've chosen to include a couple of my personal favorites and a
selection of odd or unusual covers. Not to suggest that some of each of their work wasn't already weird enough...
The legends may have passed but the
legacies live on.
As I've said before, I don't plan on running obituaries on every artist,
writer or musician that once meant something to me. If I did that, I'd never
post anything else. Certain people pass, though, and it feels necessary,
somehow, to mark a fresh absence in the world.
In the case of Marianne Faithful, who died yesterday at the age of 78,
it just so happens I once wrote a song about her. I thought I might just post the lyrics. They have an elegiac feel to them or I
like to think so.
Naked Under Leather
Downtime waiting at the jail gate
door Taken so much you gotta take more Love so rich he's making
you poor Don't understand what you're doing it for
Eyes wide
open, hair so long Wrapped in the paper of a throwaway song Looking
at you hard like you grew up wrong You'd like to break down but you're
too damn strong
Moroccan sand and the white paint wall You
can hear one crying and the other one call They say the higher you fly
the faster you fall You listen and look and say nothing at all
It's
something so easy to do what they say You tried to keep it and to give
it away Followed the path and lost your way You try to come out
but you're in there to stay
There's a scarf on the lamp and smoke
in the air You're begging for help but there's no-one there You
want to go out but there's nothing to wear It's all been sold and
you're running scared
You fight your way clear of Norwegian
wood It's dirty and clean and they tell you it's good It wasn't
worth waiting but you thought that you should You'd let it all go but
you never could
You're naked under leather Naked under
leather Naked under leather
The title, of course, is the alternative name for the infamous feature film in
which she starred, Girl On A Motorcycle. The full movie is
on YouTubeif you're interested although how long it'll stay there is anyone's guess. I
saw it on TV once. It's a slow watch.
It's also not what I'd want to remember Marianne for. That would mostly be the
superb Broken English album she released in 1979. That's also available
in full
on YouTube
if you don't own a copy, which you certainly should, although nowadays who owns anything?
She made a lot of good
music before and after but that's the one that matters. To me, anyway.
The song I wrote is mostly about the time she spent as what people used to
like to call a muse to various famous musicians That's something that will
always be linked to her memory but again, it's not what I want to remember her
for. She far surpassed any kind of supporting role to become the superstar of
her own, exceptional life.
That's about all I want to say. Probably ought to finish with an example of
her work. She had to go to court to prove her co-authorship on this one.
Figures.
I was going to do a grab-bag for Friday as is traditional but the sad news of
David Lynch's passing dictates otherwise. Reports suggest the LA
wildfires were indirectly responsible for his death at the age of 78. He
suffered from emphysema as a result of a lifetime of smoking and could no
longer walk without the aid of additional oxygen, and the strain of having to leave his home
under threat of the spreading conflagration was apparently just too much.
I make no claim to be any kind of Lynch completeist. I still haven't seen
Eraserhead although I've seen a lot of clips from it and once I came home and
switched the TV on and it was playing. I should probably watch it sometime. I
also have never seen Dune or The Elephant Man, although once
again it's been impossible to avoid the odd scene from both, here and there. Lynch's work pervades our lives, wish it or not.
Plenty of people had tried to sell me on the supposed attractions of all of
the above over the years, especially Eraserhead, the film that first made Lynch notorious, if not
famous, but I resisted. I was for a long time (And still somewhat remain.) opposed to the concept of horror as entertainment. Maybe Eraserhead is a horror movie. Maybe it's not. Either way, back then I didn't
like to be horrified, terrified, scared or shocked if I could manage to avoid
it and I could, so I did.
Even The Elephant Man could be seen as a kind of body-horror, I suppose. For whatever reason, I avoided that, too. Probably it was just too popular and I was too much the hipster then. As
for Dune, it would take more than Lynch or Denis Villeneuve to get me
to sit through an adaptation of what I consider one of the dullest, most
tedious science fiction novels I've ever read. Fool me
once...
My first exposure to the master's work came with his fourth feature,
Blue Velvet, which I saw at the cinema on release in 1986. I went to
see it at one of the two riverside art cinemas, The Watershed or
The Arnolfini, in Bristol, where I was living at the time. I forget which. I went to both a lot.
As I remember, it wasn't my choice of movie. I went with my then-girlfriend, who
introduced me to a number of directors I was unfamiliar with, chief among them
Lynch and Roman Polanski, who she really liked. Considering she had no
issues watching Knife in the Water and Repulsion, which we saw
as a double bill, it seems strange now that she walked out of Blue Velvet
about five minutes in, at the moment when Kyle Maclachlan discovers
a human ear, crawling with ants, lying in the grass.
She left but I stayed to watch the whole film. The relationship survived but didn't endure.
My connection with Lynch's work lasted much longer. In some ways, it never
stopped.
In other ways, though, it kind of did. It's odd. I was about to write that I
haven't seen any of Lynch's recent movies but when I go to check I find there
really haven't been any. His filmography is very sparse for a director of his
age and reputation. The last film of his that I went to the cinema to see when
it came out was Lost Highway in 1997, five years after I'd been to see Fire Walk With Me. I saw both at The Watershed, even though by the time Lost Highway arrived I was no longer living in the same city. Despite his commercial success, there were still only so many places you could go if you wanted to see a David Lynch movie.
After that came just three more features:
The Straight Story, Mullholland Drive and Inland Empire, the
last arriving in 2006. I have Mullholland Drive on DVD but haven't
watched it. The other two I've done nothing about although I've always wanted
to see The Straight Story, an outlier in Lynch's canon. Sometimes described as Lynch's Disney movie, entirely accurately since it was released by Disney in the US, it's based on the true tale
of a man who rode all the way from Laurens, Iowa to Mt. Zion in Wisconsin - on
a lawnmower.
Inland Empire, which I remember receiving excellent reviews, was his last
full-length movie. He made just ten in a career lasting more than forty years.
And anyone who can count will realize I've only mentioned nine of them. Missing
from the list is my favorite, the magnificent, ever-underrated
Wild At Heart. If you want a movie that's horrifying, terrifying, scary
and shocking, here it is. I love it. Obviously my horror-avoidance policy only extends so far.
David Lynch may have stopped making movies almost twenty years ago but he
never stopped making something. I have never seen a Lynch short but according
to
Wikipedia
he's made close on fifty of them, the first in 1967, the last in 2020. He's
also directed or written web series, commercials and music videos. Lots of
them. And he had a whole side hustle going for many years
as a musician, releasing three critically acclaimed albums and a host of singles from the
late nineties through the twenty-teens.
For all of that ceaseless enterprise, it's likely Lynch will be longest and
best remembered for one thing above all others: Twin Peaks. Frequently
cited as the best TV show ever made, even more often as the weirdest, Twin
Peaks ran for just two seasons in 1990 and 1991 before making a return for a third
and final run more than a decade and a half later in 2017.
Of those three seasons, the first and the third enjoy stellar reputations. The
second was seen as something of a let-down at the time, although it regained
much of its lost critical ground in later years. Lynch didn't actually direct
all that many episodes of the original two seasons, just two in the first
eight-episode run and four of the second season's twenty-two. He took complete
control over the final season, directing every episode, another twenty-two-parter,
making fifty-two in all.
As a work of art Twin Peaks could be considered inconsistent, even
self-indulgent. As a cultural force the show had the impact of a boulder
falling into a still, mountain pool. It made a gigantic splash and the ripples
are still spreading even now. It was and it remains a phenomenon.
It is very necessary at this point to mention the involvement of
Mark Frost, the writer with whom Lynch created the show and who wrote
and/or directed many of its episodes. I actually started watching Twin Peaks as much because
of Frost's involvement as Lynch's. Frost was extensively involved with what
had been my personal high-water mark of American television prior to Twin
Peaks, Hill Street Blues.
I'll leave Mark Frost for a tribute of his own, some day hopefully far away. In
any case, Twin Peaks is inexorably linked to David Lynch and always will be.
It showed on BBC2 in the UK in 1990, the same year Wild At Heart appeared in
the cinema and the mere involvement of a major Hollywood director in a TV series made headlines. The world was changing and Lynch was doing his part to make it happen faster.
There's no need to recap the plot of Twin Peaks, as if anyone ever could.
Everyone who cares knows and countless millions who care not at all have
unknowingly benefited from the sea-change the show brought to the entire
medium. There are a surprising number of shows about which it
could reasonably be said nothing was the same after but on any such list, Twin Peaks would be right at the top.
It scared the crap out of me, honestly. I was living on my own in a studio
flat at the time and I didn't even like to watch it alone. I remember having at least one nightmare about Killer Bob. Twin Peaks
isn't horror per se but it is horrifying. Also surreal, elliptical and often
incomprehensible. All marks in its favor.
I watched every episode as it was broadcast and I also taped them all on VHS
cassettes, which I still have. The recordings came in very handy when I bought
a tiny sampler that connected to my Amiga 500 and with which I put together a
three minute "song" entirely composed of samples from the show. If I
had it in a format I could access I'd play it for you now. Luckily for us all, I
don't.
At the time I held the peculiar and scarcely supportable opinion that the
second season of Twin Peaks was better than the first. I haven't seen it for
more than thirty years but I'm pretty confident now I was talking nonsense.
It's hard to be sure because despite my love and reverence for the
show, I only ever watched it that first time, as it was broadcast. I never
watched the tapes I'd made and even though I own all three seasons on DVD,
they're still in the shrink-wraps.
In fact, somewhat shamefully, I have never watched Season Three. I want to but
I also want to watch the first two seasons again first and so far I haven't
found the right time. Or just the time...
Maybe now I will. A reissue of the limited edition box set "Twin Peaks Z-A", containing all three seasons, the movie and wealth of ancillary material,
was
announced, entirely co-incidentally, on the day of his death. Maybe I'll get that and
actually watch it this time.
It's an insidious truism that it takes a death to make us remember, sometimes.
If nothing else, it reminds us we don't have all the time in the world to get
around to doing the things we mean to do. David Lynch made the very most of
the time he had. Maybe we should take that as his legacy and follow his
example.
Although I said I didn't want to turn this blog into an obituary column, I
probably need to recognise that the road is about to run out for most of the
significant names from my teens and twenties. I try my best not to give in to
nostalgia but there's
ample evidence
now that biology plays a part, too, and that's less easily shurugged
aside.
Even if that wasn't true, I am literally sitting here typing this while
looking at a visual reminder. There's a faded satin scarf strung across the
wall behind the monitor that's been there since we moved into this house
thirty years ago. Most of it is obscured now by stacks of books but the part
still showing reads "Steve Harley And Cockney R..."
Steve Harley died yesterday at the age of 73. It was a shock in a way
although as I said in reply to my ex-wife, who sent me a link to the news, I'm
always a little surprised when any old rocker makes it past sixty. They really
didn't hold back in the seventies and eighties and it catches up with most of
them eventually.
In my teens, Cockney Rebel came very close to being my favorite band. I
first heard them through the scratchy, fading signal of
Radio Luxembourg in 1973, when the band's first single, the
magnificently overwrought epic Sebastian, became a hit all across
Europe.
It was then and remains now one of my favorite songs of all time, although as
with all such favorites, I almost never listen to it. The more you listen, the
less you hear. You have to pace yourself if you want to live with a song
forever.
I bought the first album as soon as it came out a few months later and played
it incessantly and melodramatically, as we all did with our favorites in those
days. Cockney Rebel came several times to play in the city where I lived
over the next couple of years. Bands, even quite successful ones, used to come
round and round on a kind of musical conveyor belt back then, which is one
reason I rarely found it necessary to to travel far to see any of them. If
they couldn't be bothered to come to me...
The first time they played, I saw a card on the noticeboard of the super-hip
record shop I was almost too nervous to go into, asking for volunteers to come
hump gear for the band in return for a free ticket and beer. I was a bit too
young for that but I've always kind of wished I'd offered my services anyway.
It would be a story.
The next time, they'd had a few hits in the UK and had upgraded from clubs to
concert halls. I went to that one. The thing I remember most about the gig
isn't anything from the performance. It's the row of stalls outside the venue
selling scarves and tees and badges and who knows what else.
It was the first time I'd really noticed anyone selling "merch", as we
definitely didn't call it then. I imagine it was beneath the likes of
Hawkwind, Yes or Pink Floyd, the kind of bands I was used
to going to see. By their standards, Cockney Rebel was almost a pop
group.
So I bought a scarf. I mean, why not. I doubt I was even being ironic. And I
wore it for the gig and when the band got to Tumbling Down, the epic
number (All Steve Harley's songs were epics) that ended with the whole
audience singing the chorus for what seemed like hours, I held my scarf above
my head and swayed from side to side along with everyone else.
I'm not going to say it was magical. But it was.
The next year, I saw them again at the same venue. By this time they were on
their fourth album and Steve had gone weird. Weirder, I should say. It's not
like he wasn't weird to begin with but now he was heavily into Rosicrucianism
along with everything else.
The whole sound of the band (The second iteration of Cockney Rebel, after he
sacked most of the first line-up) had changed almost out of recognition, from
Bowiesque glam to a funkier groove that somehow managed to feel dry and
swamp-ridden all at the same time. Out of all expectation, I
loved it.
Cockney Rebel released five studio albums in the 1970s before calling it a day
until Steve got the band back together a good few years later, when they
recorded one more. The first two were released under the band name alone, the
others as Steve Harley And Cockney Rebel.
Of those six albums, the first - The Human Menagerie - is an
acknowledged classic, while the rest are generally considered at best hit or
miss. I like the second (The Psychomodo) and the third (Best Years Of Our Lives) a lot but they aren't entirely coherent. They each have a couple of his
best songs but also some undeniable filler. The fifth,
Love's A Prima Donna, is not great and the much later sixth album I
have never heard.
The fourth, Timeless Flight, was not well-received at the time and I'm
not sure what its critical reputation is now. It is, however, one of my
favorite albums. I listened to it a very great number of times back when I
used to play vinyl but unlike The Human Menagerie, which was the first album I
bought on CD, I never thought to upgrade.
I have, however, listened to some of the tracks online, now and again, and
relatively recently (By which I mean in the last decade.) and I think it
stands up pretty well. I have
All Men Are Hungry
on in the background as I type and it sounds great, still. What it's about I
have no more idea now than I ever did although I do now realise it has
something to do with Hemingway...
That's the thing with Steve Harley. He was a striking lyricist, famous for it,
and yet rarely did I know what he was trying to say. He was so fin de siecle
you couldn't make out the meaning for the brocade.
It didn't matter. It never mattered. As he once said of Sebastian, "It's poetry. It means what you want it to mean... I can't define its
meaning. It's like most poetry, it's a lovely word." He made his method even clearer in another interview "'Sebastian' is possibly a sort of Gothic love song, possibly not: I'm not
really sure to be honest."
If Steve didn't know what his songs were about, I don't know why we should be
expected to. What always mattered with his work was the imagery and the
emotion. That was a powerful narcotic to an adolescent and it hit me hard
enough the bruise hasn't faded yet.
Thanks for all the memories, Steve. Like your songs, they've lasted well.
As I've said before, if I posted an obituary for every notable musician,
artist and writer whose death, timely or untimely, appeared in my cultural
news feeds, I'd have a full-time job of it and there'd be no time to write
about anything else. I'd say I have to pick my tributes, except it doesn't
quite work that way. It's more like they pick me. Somehow, I just know immediately on hearing of someone's
demise that it's a moment I need to note.
The strange thing about it is, it can be someone I haven't thought
about in years. It's somehow as if their passing tears a small rip in reality
that's going to take a while to close. Well, my reality, anyway.
I own just one album by Melanie, on vinyl. I can't even remember what it's called.
I bought it some time in the 1990s, when I was trawling thrift shops and yard
sales for anything that looked interesting. I think I might have played it a
couple of times. Melanie Safka is not someone I've listened to a lot, now, then
or before.
And yet her music has been a perpetual presence in the background of my life.
When I was a young adolescent it was impossible to avoid her best-known tune,
Brand New Key, an infuriating earworm that tinned out of transistor
radios everywhere, once heard, impossible to shake. It annoyed the hell out of
me and I liked it a lot all at once, a reaction that's become a signature note
of many songs I've admired over the years.
From around then, I also remember her cover of
Ruby Tuesday, a bleak reading from the far reaches of the other end of the emotional spectrum, which eclipses even the Rolling Stones' original. She clearly had some range.
When I was at school, as I've mentioned before, we had a relatively young,
very enthusiastic music teacher, one of whose big ideas was to arrange school
trips to see live performances. He's the reason I can put a tick against
AC/DC on my "Seen Them" list.
It's hard to exaggerate just how odd that must have been at the time - a bunch
of boys from private school being taken on an official school trip to see a
touring heavy metal band - but another gig he arranged a trip to was more
believable. Melanie was, among other things, a folk-singer and even fifty
years ago, folk music enjoyed a respectability neither punk nor heavy metal will ever achieve. Probably.
At this point I ought to be reminiscing about what a great gig it was and what a marvelous performance Melanie gave. Only I can't, because I didn't go. By then I was a paid-up
punk, in so far as you could be when you were still going to a fee-paying
school. I only went on the AC/DC trip as an ironic joke. (Joke was on me -
they were stunningly good.) An hour in a bus to go see the dippy woman who
sang Brand New Key? Hell, no!
My best friend at school also declined to attend but our other pal, the uncool
one, went. The next day we heard a lot from him about how great Melanie was, especially
how, after the official part of the gig ended, she came back on stage, sat
down and played a whole bunch more songs, just her and her acoustic guitar,
for the people who hadn't already gone home after the encore.
It's strange how
I still remember that. I also remember how I wished I'd gone, after all. It
sounded like exactly the kind of experience punk was teaching me to expect
from live performance - lack of front, rapport with the audience, we're all in this thing together. Which just about pegs punk itself as a kind of folk music, I guess...
Before I was a punk I was, briefly, something of a fan of progressive rock. I
really liked glam rock, too, although I was a bit shy of admtting it. How the
order changes. Just as with punk a little later, there were a few bands who
jumped tracks or tried to, slipping out of their afghan coats into spangled
jumpsuits and stack heels. One of the most successful to make the switch from
sweaty denim to sparkles and silk scarves was Mott the Hoople.
I loved Mott. Still do, although as with the Smiths, it's increasingly
difficult to calibrate that affection with certain aspects of the singer's
persona, in this case a close read of some of the lyrics, which don't necessarily come over the same way now they did back then. In both cases, however, any of that
applies more to the solo work and for my purposes today I'm looking back far
beyond Ian Hunter's solo career, back farther even than the band's
brief, Bowie-inspired glam heyday.
As would have been my normal practice then, once the band had come to my
attention I did my best to dig back through their back catalog, which in
Mott's case was extensive. They'd been around a long time before anyone
outside the club circuit began paying attention.
They'd made, I think, four albums before All The Young Dudes, none of
which sounds all that much like any of the others. They were clearly looking for a direction and not fnding one they could all agree on.
The album I liked by far the
best and which I played over and over again was Wildlife. It's
apparently the album of theirs over which guitarist Mick Ralphs had the
most influence, which seems odd since it's close to being a folk-rock album
and he went on to form Bad Company, a numbingly straight-ahead, hard
rock act with almost no soft edges at all.
Wildlife, though, is a drifty, dreamy album among whose several highlights is
a great cover of one of Melanie's best and best-known songs - Lay Down.
Also known as "Lay Down (Candles in the Wind)", the lyric attempts to
encapsulate and communicate Melanie's transcendent experience,
playing Woodstock as one of only three female performers to appear solo at the legendary
festival. The other two were Joan Baez and Janis Joplin, which
gives some perspective.
I listened to Lay Down last night, after I heard of her death. I watched the
epic performance on Dutch TV with the Staples Singers in front of an
audience, most of whom look actively traumatised by the experience. Then I
listened to Mott's version, which still sounds as good as it did all those
years ago. I've included them both here, so you can hear them too. If either is
new to you, you're in for a treat. If you know them already, you won't need
any prompting to listen to them one more time.
And then, since it came up on the recommends, I also listened to the ineffably
warm and wonderful duet between Melanie and Miley Cyrus on another of
Melanie's classic tunes, Look What They've Done To My Song, Ma. I'd
forgotten she wrote that one. Now I wonder just how many more great songs she
wrote that I've never heard.
I guess I'd better take some time and find out. Melanie may not be with us any
more but her music is and always will be.
As I've said before, I don't like to do a lot of obituaries here on the blog because if I got started on that, I'd never stop. Someone worth remembering seems to die pretty much every day; musicians, writers, artists, entertainers. All the people that make up a life of the mind. Once in a while, though, I hear news that makes me think I maybe should at least mark the date.
It's not remotely predictable which celebrity death is going to trigger a sense of loss, either. Obviously, almost none of us knows any of these people personally but knowing the work sometimes makes it feel that way. Other times, it's just the name is so familiar, it feels weird to hear they're gone.
I had that momentary frisson this week, when I heard Keith Giffenhad died. He's not the biggest name but there was a time when almost everyone I knew would have known who he was and what he did. Not that they'd all have liked it. He was a controversial figure in his prime.
Keith Giffen drew, wrote and did some mysterious thing that seemed to be both and neither, that made him responsible for several of my favorite comics of all time. If I had to pick a single comic-book run to take with me into space, where it would be the only thing I'd have to read for the rest of forever, I might go with Giffen's forty or so issues of The Legion of Super-Heroes, published at the cusp of the 'nineties.
Known as "5 Years Later" it wasn't so much a reboot of the longstanding teen title as a complete rewrite. It was the classic audience divider. People either loved it or utterly loathed it. As a quondam nihilist and lifelong Legion fan, I thought it was the best version of the title I'd ever seen. I still do. It still is.
It would be fatuous to go into expositionary detail about the plot or the characterization or the setting and how every expectation was confounded. If you aren't a fan you won't care and if you are you'll already know. The point is, Giffen tore up everything and started over and still kept everything and carried on, which is a hard trick to carry.
He didn't do it alone. Comics is a collaborative medium. Most of the dialog was handled by husband and wife team Tom and Mary Bierbaum, who did an exemplary job of it. Keith Giffen handled the plotting and initially did the pencils, later moving to layouts. I guess if it'd been a TV series, he'd have been the Showrunner.
5YL was Keith's second stint with my favorite super-hero team. He'd penciled The Great Darkness saga for Paul Levitz in the early 'eighties, another high-water mark for the title, He also worked frequently with another of my favorite comic-book professionals, writer Robert Loren Fleming, co-creator of what I always used to say was my favorite comic, Thriller, and he penciled another of my all-time favorites, the Defenders, one of the first series I collected on my return to the fold, having briefly dropped the medium when I was "too old for comics" in my mid-teens.
I didn't just like Giffen's ideas; I loved the way he drew and I especially loved his layouts. He was an exponent of the nine-panel grid, a rigid format that turned a lot of readers off but that I found exhilarating and weirdly stimulating. I just had to look at the shape of those frames to feel the chaotic energy dammed up behind the restraining frames. It felt electric.
One of the things that continues to surprise me about modern life is the way people who used to be utterly unknown to all but a small cadre of obsessives now merit mentions on the national news and lengthy obituaries in the quality press when they die. At the time Keith Giffen was doing his best work, I don't believe there would have been a single newspaper, television or radio program in the UK that would have marked the passing of a comic artist of his stature with so much as a single word.
That said, Keith never attained the stature of an Alan Moore or a Grant Morrison even within the industry. He was a comic fan's favorite more than any kind of breakthrough artist and even among comics fans he was always something of an acquired taste. The dark and disturbing direction in which he took the LSH was atypical of his work in general, which tended more to the comedic than many super-hero fans found comfortable.
He was responsible for bringing Ambush Bug into the world, an act for which there are many who'll likely never forgive him. He gave us Lobo (Ditto.) and Rocket Racoon, thanks to the movies now the best-known of his amoral, anarchic, anti-heroes.
He also turned the Justice League of America into a sitcom, something he'd previously helped do to Marvel's Defenders when he penciled that excellent series from Steve Gerber's idiosyncratic and irreverent scripts. Strangely, for an artist with such a gift for visual discipline and intensity, he probably leaves us with a reputation as a humorist above all else.
Most of what I've been talking about happened quite a while ago although Keith was still working in comics until fairly recently. I need to catch up with the comics he wrote and drew in the first decade of the new millennium. I bet they're great. Everything of his I've ever read was at the very least good. Most of it was excellent.
Not everything we once loved stands up to re-examination but Keith's work does. I re-read the whole of 5YL only a couple of years ago. It was even better than I remembered.
I think I might read it again. And those Justice Leagues, too, if I can find them.
"To inspire somebody would be one of the best things we could
possibly do."
That's Mark Stewart of The Pop Group, speaking to
Paul Rambali of the New Musical Express back in 1978. Mark
died
last week. I was surprised to learn he was 62, a couple of years younger than
me. I always just thought he'd be older.
As The Pop Group's
wikipedia page
puts it "Despite their lack of commercial success, their music inspired and
influenced many bands and artists that followed them. They are cited as an
influence by artists and bands like
Minutemen, Primal Scream, Sonic Youth, Steve Albini of
Big Black, Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails and
Massive Attack." And the rest, eh?
In retrospect, I think it's possible to overstate The Pop Group's outsider
status. I recently had cause to go through a stack of music papers from the
late '70s and I was surprised at the sheer number of times
the band's name appears, often prominently. They were cover-featured on the 30
September 1978 issue of NME, behind a gorgeous photo of Mark, looking like a
male model or a matinee idol from the age of the Silver Screen. At that point
they'd never made a record.
The uncanny ability to draw attention was theirs from the start and Mark's charismatic force was a major part of it. I was in the
audience for The Pop Group's first gig. It was at a nightclub on Clifton Downs
in Bristol called The Locarno, a sizeable venue for any band who'd never
cut a record or played live, let alone one all of whose members were still at
school. The place was packed. The Pop Group had a rep in their home town
even before they showed up to earn it. Even their first gig was An Event.
As I remember it - and it has to be stressed my memory is fallible and I
wasn't, sadly, in the habit of keeping a diary back then - there was no
support band. Instead we were treated to a couple of hours of the band's own
favorites and influences, an eclectic selection of unfamiliar and frequently
uncomfortable slabs of jazz, funk, dub and if I'm not imagining it, musique
concrete. I'm pretty sure there was some
Pierre Henry
in there, somewhere. I think that's how I came to own one of his albums.
It felt like a long two hours, although I had reasons not to want it shortened
that had nothing to do with the music and upon which I don't care to
elaborate. Eventually the band appeared. They looked uncanny and sounded...
less alien than they would in a few months. Among a storming set of powerful
originals they included rousing covers of Jonathan Richman's
Roadrunner and - unbelievable as it sounds now - Marc Bolan's
Solid Gold Easy Action.
A few weeks later my best friend Chris and I published a fanzine, which we
called Mrs O'Reilly's Dog, because even then I was determined to make
sure anything that had my name on was as obscure, inaccessible and
uncommercial as possible. In that opening and, as it turned out, only issue,
there was a review of the Pop Group's first gig written, I think, by Chris, in
which the band were described as something along the lines.of "four midgets and a giant".
I can't recall the exact phrasing. I do have a copy I could refer to but it's
in the loft and I'm too old to be climbing through that tiny hatch any more.
Anyway, chances are the review wouldn't be there to check. Someone in The Pop
Group or their management took offense, either to the way we'd characterized
their physical appearance or the way we honed in on those cover versions, I
can't remember which.
Mark Stewart's height, sometimes given as six-foot
seven, comes up frequently in pieces about the band. I doubt that was a
problem but no-one likes to be called a short-ass - or a covers band.
Chris agreed to remove the offending review from all the copies we had. He
literally cut them out with scissors. We would have sold them with half a page missing,
had anyone wanted to buy them, which fortunately for our nascent journalistic
integrity, they did not.
How we dressed in 1978. If we were The Pop Group.
Possibly despite that incident or possibly because of it, relations between our
band and The Pop Group flourished. We supported them twice at local gigs and I
learned, too late, that we'd been invited to support them at a more prestigious
London show. Supposedly a couple of the group really liked us, while the
rest very much did not. I was told which was which at the time but it's long
lost knowledge now. It'd be nice to think Mark was one of the pair who thought we had something but I fear it wasn't him.
I retail this anecdote second-hand because I, personally, don't recall ever
doing more than passing the time of day with any member of The Pop Group. All
communication went through either Chris or his brother, Phil, our drummer and
guitarist respectively. The first I ever heard of this supposed invite was
when one of them told me they'd turned it down because London was too far to
travel. If there's one thing I regret more about my time in the band than that
we never made a record it's that I didn't involve myself more in the
administration but what nineteen-year old wants to do that? It just seemed so much easier to let someone else do it.
All of this I told, years later in the mid-1990s, to an eager American guy
who'd just started a website dedicated to The Pop Group. I'd found the site
while trawling the web, something that seemed like an adventure in itself back
then. Following my already-established pattern I left a long comment, which
led to first to a correspondence, then to my sending him a copy of the
controversial review, and finally to a personal visit from the website's
creator, who came to the city where I live and stayed with us for a night.
Double page spread in Sounds, three months even before the NME
cover.
All of these events framed and shaped my attitude to what information I was
willing to reveal about myself across the internet for many years. I mean, it
was exciting and all but when people come to your house it gets
weird.
Backtracking, almost the last time I saw The Pop Group was around 1980 at the
Corn Exchange in Cambridge, where I was at university, studying English. They
were co-headling a bill with Linton Kwesi Johnson, the dub poet.
Mark Perry's band, The Good Missionaries were supporting.
I dragged a bunch of college friends along to see them. Like most of the
audience, they were mainly interested in LKJ. When it was announced, after the
gig had begun, that he wouldn't be appearing after all, half the audience
left. The Good Missionaries played their fairly uncompromising set, which
shifted a few more people out into the street. Then The Pop Group came on to
see if they couldn't get rid of the rest.
By then, they'd released what is still one of my favorite singles of all time,
the incendiary She Is Beyond Good And Evil, as well as their
now-legendary first album, the enigmatically-titled "Y" but most people
left in the room hadn't come to hear any of that. The Pop Group didn't care.
They played it all anyway, giving one of the most inacessible, challenging
performances I've ever heard. There certainly weren't any crowd-pleasing
covers this time.
She Is Beyond Good And Evil - The Pop Group
By the end of the gig, the hall was more than three-quarters empty but most of
the people who'd stayed were onstage with the band, having a
great time. It was a rioutous, joyous, celebratory affirmation of
acceptance of the other, a philosophy The Pop Group lived as well as preached.
Until a year later, following the release of their second, even more
uncompromising album, "For How Much Longer Do We Tolerate Mass Murder?", when the band split up.
As
Rolling Stone
described it "The Group broke up in 1980, as Stewart’s interests drifted deeper into
reggae and his bandmates wanted to explore free jazz.", stretching the old "musical differences" cliche to its
absurdist limits. The various members dispersed, forming a number of more
commercially successful outfits that included Pigbag,
Maximum Joy, Rip, Rig and Panic as well as my own favorites, the
before-their-time and decidedly not commercially successful Head.
Mark Stewart wasn't in any of them. He moved smoothly into a successful solo
career, rich in collaboration. He transferred his very considerable talents to
Adrian Sherwood's On-U Sound collective, where he recorded and toured through
the eighties alongside the likes of Tackhead,
African Headcharge and the New Age Steppers.
Hysteria - Mark Stewart and The Maffia
I saw him on stage again, for the final time, sometime in the mid-eighties,
when he made a triumphal return to Bristol, playing in a kind of On-U Sound
package tour with Tackhead and Gary Clail, among others. The entire
event was top-class musical entertainment but even among that stellar line-up,
Mark effortlessly prevailed. His overwhelming physical presence and the
floor-shaking resonance of his voice made him a standout in any company.
According to all of the
personal tributes
from those who knew him, he was an affable, friendly kind of giant, immensely
willing to help guide and mentor other musicians. He offered a wellspring of creativity
and imagination and acted as an indefatigable campaigner for social justice as
he conceived it - and he was a right good laugh, to boot.
I know nothing of that. I just know he was a blindingly good performer who
fronted a blindingly good band at a time when few either wanted or understood
what he and they had to offer. It meant those of us who thought in the know were
able to feel all clever about it.
Fortunately for Mark, there were some people out there who really did get it.
Time proved him right and everyone else wrong. He found an audience who truly
understood his message and in his wish to be an inspiration to others he
absolutely succeeded.
When I began following Pitchfork a few years ago the thing I noticed
most was that famous musicians die all the time. Partly it's that there are a
lot of famous musicians for a given value of "famous", that
value being "anyone someone at Pitchfork has vaguely heard of". Partly
it's that popular music has been popular for a really, really long time now,
so a lot of popular musicians are getting really, really old. Partly
it's that even more musicians don't get to be old at all because they have a
tendency not to look after themselves very well. Or at all. In fact, the
opposite.
After a while I stopped being surprised by the death toll and only really paid
attention when someone I own records by or had seen perform or who were so
famous I knew who they were without either of those things being true upped
and died. Even then, it took the death of someone with truly epic cultural
reach to make me consider mentioning it here.
Mostly I didn't because, as I saw it, this blog only concerned itself with
video games, specifically the massively multiple online role-playing kind. I
think the only exception I made was for
David Bowieand that only because he was such a polymath he actually had made a
significant contribution to gaming.
That was in the before times. These days anything goes. At
Inventory Full we're still more about the mmos than anything (also we
talk about ourselves in the second person plural now, apparently...) but music
is a regular strand along with movies, television, books...
So, when I read that Phil Spector had died I thought I might mention
it. I definitely wouldn't say Spector was on Bowie's level, not even close,
but his cultural reach was significant. He was also a convicted murderer,
which is going some even by rock and roll standards of bad behavior.
That's not really why I thought I might commemorate his passing. It was more
that he, or more accurately his famous Wall of Sound production
technique, was strangely important to me at an entirely inappropriate time and
for a peculiar reason, one that I believe was and still is emblematic of the
way certain cultural events end up being misconstrued and misrepresented by
those who get to the tell their histories.
I have no personal experience of how important Spector's musical innovations
were when he was big news in the sixties. I was a small child and if I heard
the Crystals or the Ronettes on the radio I wasn't listening.
Even when I bought the Beatles last album, Let It Be, aged
twelve or thirteen, I had no idea what a record producer did, let alone the
names of any. I had no clue Phil Spector had produced that record nor how
controversial it must have been for Beatles fans to see his name on the sleeve
instead of George Martin's. Then, I was no Beatles fan. I picked them
as one of my first purchases precisely because I knew nothing about pop
music.
But I wanted to learn. And I did. Fast. A few years later, in my mid-teens I
could tell you the full line-up of any and every band I whose records I owned.
I could tell you what instruments they played, who wrote the songs and, yes,
who the producer was. Probably could have had a fair stab at naming the
engineer, too.
By 1976 I for sure knew who Phil Spector was. I was backfilling my knowledge
on the last twenty years of rock, pop, folk and even jazz just as fast as the
print media of the day could get it to me. Which wasn't nearly fast
enough.
I'd exited my mercifully brief infatuation with hard rock, proto-metal and
prog to immerse myself with increasing intensity in the darker, artier sounds
of the anti-sixties -
The Velvet Underground, the Social Deviants, the Stooges, the Fugs, Captain
Beefheart - but I was a voracious and eclectic consumer. I gulped down everything from
Joan Armatrading to the Doctors of Madness.
I knew what I liked because what I liked was the good stuff. It had to
be, because I liked it. I never lacked for confidence in my own tastes.
Still don't, as may be apparent. I was pre-made for punk. I just had to wait
for it to happen.
In the summer of '76, in a story I've told here before, I stumbled across my
first punk band. I'd read about the concept. The movement had been mumbled
about in the music press for maybe two or three years by then but it was
something else entirely to see it happening in front of me.
Like many teenagers who had similar experiences, my friends and I went home
that very day and started a band. A punk band. We had to get hold of some
instruments and amps first. Also write some songs. Maybe learn to play,
although that never seemed very important, certainly not to our drummer.
It took a little longer than we'd have liked. And we'd started quite early.
There weren't a lot of punk bands to go and watch or punk records to listen to
while we waited for the scene to coalesce. So we improvised.
We doubled down on our musicological excavation of the deep past, namely the
1960s, which seemed about as far away as the Dark Ages to us and about as
real. Anything uptempo with a running time under three and a half minutes was
fair game. I remember listening to a lot of early Who and
Tamla Motown. Honestly, we might as well have been Jam fans.
Which we weren't.
There were a few albums I played a lot. A two-disc
Monkees retrospective was one. Another was a compilation of surf and
doo-wop hits, some of them produced by Shadow Morton, I think. It must
be somewhere in my unsorted piles of vinyl but I'm blowed if I'm going to go
look for it. I remember it had New York's A Lonely Townby
the Trade Winds. I played that one a lot.
Way better even than a bunch of ironic surfers, the standout act on that
startlingly random collection was the Shangri Las. I loved the
Shangri Las in 1977. Almost as much as I love them now. I couldn't get enough
of them.
No, seriously, I couldn't. It was 1977. You didn't ask Alexa to "play the Shangri Las". You didn't Amazon Prime their Best Of so you could listen to
it before ten the same evening. You didn't even get the bus into town, go to
your favorite record shop and pull the Shangs' Greatest Hits off the
rack. There were no Shangri Las albums for sale in 1977 unless you
lucked out and found one in a second hand store.
Okay, there most likely was some kind of import you could have ordered
but the only time I ever tried ordering imports from my supposedly friendly
record store they lost the order and really weren't all that bothered about
it. Customer service was another thing you couldn't easily find in the 1970s.
And come to think of it, Leader of the Pack had been a hit all over
again only a couple of years before so there probably had been a Greatest Hits
out to go with it. Maybe I didn't try as hard as I could have.
And maybe that was because I'd already found something else that did the job
almost as well. Not quite but close. A collection of Phil Spector hits, only
not the really obvious ones. Again, it's downstairs somewhere. Haven't seen it
in a quarter of a century. Doesn't matter because I remember the two tracks
that really counted.
The first was Darlene Love's
Today I Met The Boy I'm Gonna Marry. I thought Darlene Love had one of
the most distinctive voices I'd heard, so strong even Spector's battering-ram
battalions had to take a back seat for once. I wasn't to know she'd just get
better and better.
The track I really loved, though, the one I played again and again, singing
along at top volume (thick walls and no immediate neighbors, luckily for them)
was less celebrated yet than even Darlene's minor hit (#39 on the U.S. Hot 100
in 1963 ). Home of the Brave by Bonnie and the Treasures reached
the less than dizzy heights of #77 two years later, part of a bizarre
who-got-there-first battle with Jody Miller, which you can read about
here. Spoiler: Jody wins.
I frickin' love Home of the Brave. I love the performance. It starts
out angry, storms through outraged and climaxes at vengeful. I love the
pacing, the loping, stalking menace and threat. I love the bombast and the
sturm und drang of the arrangement. Most of all I love the lyric, quite
possibly the purest case for the rebel without a cause ever put to vinyl.
It's a perfect pop song in every way that matters and it's perfectly punk,
too. It's in your face, snotty and it doesn't give a fuck. Which is supposedly
a lot like Phil Spector although no-one much seems to have found him endearing
the way everyone did Charlotte O' Hara. Then, she probably never held
anyone at gun point, locked them in the studio, made them sing the same line
over and over for hours until they begged to be let go. And she certainly
never shot anyone with that gun she wasn't always waving around.
Yes, by pretty much all accounts Phil Spector really was a bad boy. The judge
thought so, anyway, when he sentenced Spector to nineteen years in jail.
Spector was seventy. He'd have been eligible for parole in 2024, by which time
he'd have been eighty-five. He didn't make it.
Reading over his dealings with the many acts he produced, wrote for and
recorded over a long career, he doesn't seem like he'd have been all that much
fun to work with. Or any. But it wasn't his job to be nice. His job was to
facilitate the making of great music, maybe even great art, and that he
managed handily, even if now I read the full story he had precious little to
do with Home of the Brave, having neither written nor produced it, nor even
done the arrangements, merely picked it for release on one of his labels.
I'd say he'll be missed but I have no idea if that's true. His work remains
and that will stand. It's enough. It's more than enough. It might even
be too mcuh.